MPAA (R) RogerEbert.com (3 1/2 Stars) Fr. Dennis (4 Stars)
IMDb listing
Los Angeles Times (K. Turan) review
RogerEbert.com (N. Minow) review
A Private War [2018] (directed by Matthew Heineman, screenplay Arash Amel by based on the Vanity Fair article by Marie Brenner [VF] [IMDb]) tells the story of Marie Colvin [wikip] (played by Rosamund Pike) an (American) journalist who covered some of the most brutal dangerous conflicts / civil wars of our time from the Civil War in Tamil Tiger Civil War in Lanka (where she lost one of her eyes) to the Arab Spring inspired Revolution in Libya that deposed Gaddafi to the subsequent Syrian Civil War where she (not really a spoiler alert) she died during Seige of Homs.
This is a harrowing tale of a driven journalist who repeatedly risked her life to tell the stories of innocent people in war zones who otherwise we'd never know about. Why did she do it? That's one of the questions that the movie asks viewers to consider. Yet, whatever her motive, and it was almost certainly mostly pure, we owe her and other journalists like her an enormous debt. Justice depends on being able to understand what's going on. She and other journalists like her help us to understand precisely that -- what's going on. A deep deep thank you for journalists like her.
< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >
Reviews of current films written by Fr. Dennis Zdenek Kriz, OSM of St. Philip Benizi Parish, Fullerton, CA
Sunday, December 2, 2018
At Eternity's Gate [2018]
MPAA (PG-13) RogerEbert.com (3 Stars) AVClub (C+) Fr. Dennis (4 Stars)
IMDb listing
Los Angeles Times (K. Turan) review
RogerEbert.com (B. Tallerico) review
AVClub (M. D'Angelo) review
At Eternity's Gate [2018] (directed and cowritten by Julian Schnabel along with Jean-Claude Carrière and Louise Kugelberg) tells the story, again, of tormented impressionist artist Vincent Van Gogh [wikip] [IMDb] (played in the current film quite admirably by Willem Dafoe).
Why would an artist who _never_ sold even one of his paintings during his life time, who clearly was tormented (he _cut off his ear_ for God's sake in apparently a terribly misguided expression of ... unrequited love) and who arguably committed suicide (though he could have even flubbed that up ... being killed instead by simply random petty thieves) BE SO FASCINATING TO SO MANY PEOPLE (US) TODAY? Exactly ;-)
It would seem that Vincent Van Gogh was an archeotypical supremely talented but tormented, misunderstood ... LOSER ;-).
It would seem that his legacy embodies fundamental fears that many of us have of "never being able to make our mark" (though somehow we'd feel entitled to make said mark ;-). And yes, like Franz Kafka (another tormented soul, never really appreciated in his lifetime) he's been vindicated -- IN SPADES (!) -- since his death, more than a century ago (!). TODAY we look at his pictures, so many of them SO FAMOUS _now_ and wonder "how it it possible that people didn't see his genius while he was alive?"
SO ... quiet loser in his life time (and again Willem Dafoe plays him really, really well) ... he embodies a hope that "one day" those who don't understand us ... will.
Honestly, GREAT introspective / tormented, and dare one say _impressionistic_ film ;-).
< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >
IMDb listing
Los Angeles Times (K. Turan) review
RogerEbert.com (B. Tallerico) review
AVClub (M. D'Angelo) review
At Eternity's Gate [2018] (directed and cowritten by Julian Schnabel along with Jean-Claude Carrière and Louise Kugelberg) tells the story, again, of tormented impressionist artist Vincent Van Gogh [wikip] [IMDb] (played in the current film quite admirably by Willem Dafoe).
Why would an artist who _never_ sold even one of his paintings during his life time, who clearly was tormented (he _cut off his ear_ for God's sake in apparently a terribly misguided expression of ... unrequited love) and who arguably committed suicide (though he could have even flubbed that up ... being killed instead by simply random petty thieves) BE SO FASCINATING TO SO MANY PEOPLE (US) TODAY? Exactly ;-)
It would seem that Vincent Van Gogh was an archeotypical supremely talented but tormented, misunderstood ... LOSER ;-).
It would seem that his legacy embodies fundamental fears that many of us have of "never being able to make our mark" (though somehow we'd feel entitled to make said mark ;-). And yes, like Franz Kafka (another tormented soul, never really appreciated in his lifetime) he's been vindicated -- IN SPADES (!) -- since his death, more than a century ago (!). TODAY we look at his pictures, so many of them SO FAMOUS _now_ and wonder "how it it possible that people didn't see his genius while he was alive?"
SO ... quiet loser in his life time (and again Willem Dafoe plays him really, really well) ... he embodies a hope that "one day" those who don't understand us ... will.
Honestly, GREAT introspective / tormented, and dare one say _impressionistic_ film ;-).
< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >
Saturday, December 1, 2018
2.0 [2018]
MPAA (UR would be PG-13) RogerEbert.com (3 1/2 Stars) Fr. Dennis (4 Stars)
IMDb listing
FiBt listing
RogerEbert.com (S. Abrams) review
2.0 [2018] [IMDb] [FiBt] (directed and tamil dialogue cowritten by S. Shankar [IMDb] [FiBt], along with Jayamohan [IMDb] and Lakshmi Saravanakumar [IMDb], hindi dialogue written by Abbas Tyrewala [IMDb]) is a fun if apparently wildly expensive Indian (Tamil) Sci-Fi film about "The Day the Cell Phones Disappeared."
What happened? They just all "flew away," right out of people's hands all over the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu, one day. Why?
Well, they seem to have been "called together" by the soul of a tormented environmental activist named Pakshi Rajan (played by Akshay Kumar [IMDb] [FiBt]) who had been convinced that microwaves from cell phones were killing birds (by frying their brains). So in despair, he had hung himself from a cell-tower in protest and ... his soul apparently got sucked into the microwave ether where ... he became able to call all the cell phones from all over the state to form a shape changing "flock" of cell phones that sometimes even took the form of a GIGANTIC bird of prey that would attack random "people of interest" (usually promoters of cell phone and other "anti-bird" technology) throughout Tamil Nadu.
Enter a geeky scientist named Dr. Vaseegaran (played by Rajinikanth [IMDb] [FiBt]), He too was (mildly) bitter. He had previously created a marvelous all-purpose (but particularly adept at law-enforcement) robot named ... Chitti (also played by Rajinikanth [IMDb] [FiBt]). But the good doctor had been forced previously (at the end of a previous film... Endhiran [2010] [IMDb] [FiBt]) to terminate his research by a government not particularly interested in robotic technology (in a country with so many PEOPLE desperate for work / livelihoods). Sooo ... pouting a bit ... he contented himself with creating a simultaneously hot yet sensible looking / super intelligent robotic personal assistant named Nila (played by Amy Jackson [IMDb] [FiBt]) to "accompany him" in his "waning years." Honestly Asimov would have been awe-struck by (and perhaps tormented over) Nila. She was truly EVERYTHING but ... free (but, of course, programmed not to mind...).
But now the country was in peril. So the Government FINALLY gives him the permission to "unleash" his original creation, Chitti, into the fray to battle this otherworldly cellphone dominating Monster. Much often very, very funny ensues... in good part because "Chitti" is not exactly "robocop" but rather a rather chatty, again, truly all-purpose robot ;-). Anyway, much ensues ...
A fair question could be asked: Does the plot make sense? BUT does it have to? Did ANY of the plots of Sharknado movies ever make sense? What about the Spielberg, Belushi, Aykroyd "flop" 1941? There are SO MANY sight gags, one liners, two liners in this film that to complain about "plot integrity" would be to WILDLY MISS THE POINT ;-). A truly fun / great job ;-)
< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >
IMDb listing
FiBt listing
RogerEbert.com (S. Abrams) review
2.0 [2018] [IMDb] [FiBt] (directed and tamil dialogue cowritten by S. Shankar [IMDb] [FiBt], along with Jayamohan [IMDb] and Lakshmi Saravanakumar [IMDb], hindi dialogue written by Abbas Tyrewala [IMDb]) is a fun if apparently wildly expensive Indian (Tamil) Sci-Fi film about "The Day the Cell Phones Disappeared."
What happened? They just all "flew away," right out of people's hands all over the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu, one day. Why?
Well, they seem to have been "called together" by the soul of a tormented environmental activist named Pakshi Rajan (played by Akshay Kumar [IMDb] [FiBt]) who had been convinced that microwaves from cell phones were killing birds (by frying their brains). So in despair, he had hung himself from a cell-tower in protest and ... his soul apparently got sucked into the microwave ether where ... he became able to call all the cell phones from all over the state to form a shape changing "flock" of cell phones that sometimes even took the form of a GIGANTIC bird of prey that would attack random "people of interest" (usually promoters of cell phone and other "anti-bird" technology) throughout Tamil Nadu.
Enter a geeky scientist named Dr. Vaseegaran (played by Rajinikanth [IMDb] [FiBt]), He too was (mildly) bitter. He had previously created a marvelous all-purpose (but particularly adept at law-enforcement) robot named ... Chitti (also played by Rajinikanth [IMDb] [FiBt]). But the good doctor had been forced previously (at the end of a previous film... Endhiran [2010] [IMDb] [FiBt]) to terminate his research by a government not particularly interested in robotic technology (in a country with so many PEOPLE desperate for work / livelihoods). Sooo ... pouting a bit ... he contented himself with creating a simultaneously hot yet sensible looking / super intelligent robotic personal assistant named Nila (played by Amy Jackson [IMDb] [FiBt]) to "accompany him" in his "waning years." Honestly Asimov would have been awe-struck by (and perhaps tormented over) Nila. She was truly EVERYTHING but ... free (but, of course, programmed not to mind...).
But now the country was in peril. So the Government FINALLY gives him the permission to "unleash" his original creation, Chitti, into the fray to battle this otherworldly cellphone dominating Monster. Much often very, very funny ensues... in good part because "Chitti" is not exactly "robocop" but rather a rather chatty, again, truly all-purpose robot ;-). Anyway, much ensues ...
A fair question could be asked: Does the plot make sense? BUT does it have to? Did ANY of the plots of Sharknado movies ever make sense? What about the Spielberg, Belushi, Aykroyd "flop" 1941? There are SO MANY sight gags, one liners, two liners in this film that to complain about "plot integrity" would be to WILDLY MISS THE POINT ;-). A truly fun / great job ;-)
< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >
Ralph Breaks the Internet [2018]
MPAA (PG) CNS/USCCB (A-II) RogerEbert.com (3 Stars) AVClub (B) Fr. Dennis (2 1/2 Stars)
IMDb listing
CNS/USCCB (J. Mulderig) review
Los Angeles Times (J. Chang) review
RogerEbert.com (B. Tallerico) review
AVClub (J. Hassenger) review
Ralph Breaks the Internet [2018] (codirected by Phil Johnston and Rich Moore, screenplay cowritten by Phil Johnston and Pamela Ribon, story cowritten by Rich Moore, Phil Johnston, Jim Reardon, Pamela Ribon and Josie Trinidad additional material by Kelly Younger) is a film that I honestly liked better before I set out to write about it as I do believe there are some aspects of the film that I do believe were not particularly well thought out.
The film begins where the surprise children's animated hit Wreck-it Ralph [2012] left-off. So, like the original it is set among the community of characters living inside the video games of a Video Arcade. Each night after the arcade shuts down the characters gather together -- traveling up and down the electric cords that power their machines and connect them together -- to catch-up on the day's events.
We find that Ralph (voiced by John C. Reilly) has generally found his peace with having been literally programmed in the video game featuring him to be game's "villain" (the one who breaks things, that another character in the game then tries to fix...). He's learned that after clocking out for the for the night that he can literally "leave his job behind" and "become his own person" among the other characters from his / the other games. (There's an amusing scene near the end of the current film where Ralph and some of the other "villain characters" from some of the other video games are "discussing Dostoyevsky" in the support group that they have formed ;-).
But among the various characters from the other games, Ralph's come to be particularly close (in, one hopes..., a generally "foster father / "mentor" sort of way...) to another, significantly younger sounding character, named Vanellope (voiced by Sarah Silverman). She's a character, at one point nicknamed "Glitch" because she wasn't perfect, from a young girl-oriented car racing arcade game named "Sugar Rush" that in the previous film, he felt sorry for / helped. Indeed, trying to keep her happy -- Vanellope was _mildly_ complaining that she's been getting rather bored as she's been riding the same courses in her video game name for years -- Ralph uses his "wreck-things" ability to try to carve out a new course for Vanellope in her game.
HOWEVER, when the next morning the first human beings, two young girls, come in to play the "Sugar Rush" game, because the new course was so new / challenging they accidentally rip the steering wheel off of the arcade game. Since a replacement steering wheel for, let's face it, a rather old arcade game would run over $200, the owner of the Arcade decides to just "unplug" the "Sugar Rush" game and makes plans to send it to the scrap heap.
What to do? Well it turns out that the Arcade Owner had plugged in a new gadget in the recent days called a "Wifi-Server" ;-) and ... even though initially the characters from the various Arcade games found "the Server" "kinda boring", they soon learn that "if only" ... Ralph and Vanellope could (1) get to Ebay.com over the internet ;-), they could buy the replacement steering wheel for the "Sugar Rush" game and (2) make some money on the internet to pay for it, they could fix the game themselves so that the Owner wouldn't have to get rid of it. And so, Ralph and Vanellope set off to surf (inside) the Internet and ... much ensues ;-).
Among that which ensues is that the effervescent Vanellope finds a far cooler (if somewhat more violent) auto race game there called "Slaughter Race" that she finds she ... kinda likes. It's so different from the bouncy / happy "Sugar Rush" game that she's literally "always known," and she also makes friends with a rather gruff if kind female race car driver from that game named Shank (voiced by Gal Godot).
While on the Internet, Vanellope also runs into the "Disney Princesses" and ... and is forced to confront the question(s): (1) Is she first / foremost "a princess" herself _or_ "a race car driver, " and (2) what's exactly "a princess" (a nice / good behaved girl) supposed to be anyway. And as Vanellope tries to figure herself out, the _other_ Disney Princesses begin to re-evaluate their own understandings of themselves. SERIOUSLY the "Princess" scenes here are fascinating.
In the midst of this Ralph becomes somewhat confused: He's been trying to come up with ways to make some money on the internet so that he could buy that replacement steering wheel for his friend / charge Vanellope so that she could come back with him to the Video Arcade BUT even he's starting to see that Vanellope is really "finding life" / "new challenges / opportunities" _elsewhere_ ... inside this boundless universe of the Internet. SO ... what to do?
That's thematically the rest of the film. Honestly, the questions asked in the film are interesting. I just wish there wasn't such an age difference between Ralph and Vanallope. They have, I suppose a "step father / step daughter" or "mentor / mentee" relationship but it's not clear and honestly after a point I've started to be somewhat creeped-out by it.
So, honestly, as good as the film is on one one hand, on the other it's really more for the adults, the "Ralphs" of this world than for the Vanallopes / children of the world. And this is why I give it a lower rating than I initially would have.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
IMDb listing
CNS/USCCB (J. Mulderig) review
Los Angeles Times (J. Chang) review
RogerEbert.com (B. Tallerico) review
AVClub (J. Hassenger) review
Ralph Breaks the Internet [2018] (codirected by Phil Johnston and Rich Moore, screenplay cowritten by Phil Johnston and Pamela Ribon, story cowritten by Rich Moore, Phil Johnston, Jim Reardon, Pamela Ribon and Josie Trinidad additional material by Kelly Younger) is a film that I honestly liked better before I set out to write about it as I do believe there are some aspects of the film that I do believe were not particularly well thought out.
The film begins where the surprise children's animated hit Wreck-it Ralph [2012] left-off. So, like the original it is set among the community of characters living inside the video games of a Video Arcade. Each night after the arcade shuts down the characters gather together -- traveling up and down the electric cords that power their machines and connect them together -- to catch-up on the day's events.
We find that Ralph (voiced by John C. Reilly) has generally found his peace with having been literally programmed in the video game featuring him to be game's "villain" (the one who breaks things, that another character in the game then tries to fix...). He's learned that after clocking out for the for the night that he can literally "leave his job behind" and "become his own person" among the other characters from his / the other games. (There's an amusing scene near the end of the current film where Ralph and some of the other "villain characters" from some of the other video games are "discussing Dostoyevsky" in the support group that they have formed ;-).
But among the various characters from the other games, Ralph's come to be particularly close (in, one hopes..., a generally "foster father / "mentor" sort of way...) to another, significantly younger sounding character, named Vanellope (voiced by Sarah Silverman). She's a character, at one point nicknamed "Glitch" because she wasn't perfect, from a young girl-oriented car racing arcade game named "Sugar Rush" that in the previous film, he felt sorry for / helped. Indeed, trying to keep her happy -- Vanellope was _mildly_ complaining that she's been getting rather bored as she's been riding the same courses in her video game name for years -- Ralph uses his "wreck-things" ability to try to carve out a new course for Vanellope in her game.
HOWEVER, when the next morning the first human beings, two young girls, come in to play the "Sugar Rush" game, because the new course was so new / challenging they accidentally rip the steering wheel off of the arcade game. Since a replacement steering wheel for, let's face it, a rather old arcade game would run over $200, the owner of the Arcade decides to just "unplug" the "Sugar Rush" game and makes plans to send it to the scrap heap.
What to do? Well it turns out that the Arcade Owner had plugged in a new gadget in the recent days called a "Wifi-Server" ;-) and ... even though initially the characters from the various Arcade games found "the Server" "kinda boring", they soon learn that "if only" ... Ralph and Vanellope could (1) get to Ebay.com over the internet ;-), they could buy the replacement steering wheel for the "Sugar Rush" game and (2) make some money on the internet to pay for it, they could fix the game themselves so that the Owner wouldn't have to get rid of it. And so, Ralph and Vanellope set off to surf (inside) the Internet and ... much ensues ;-).
Among that which ensues is that the effervescent Vanellope finds a far cooler (if somewhat more violent) auto race game there called "Slaughter Race" that she finds she ... kinda likes. It's so different from the bouncy / happy "Sugar Rush" game that she's literally "always known," and she also makes friends with a rather gruff if kind female race car driver from that game named Shank (voiced by Gal Godot).
While on the Internet, Vanellope also runs into the "Disney Princesses" and ... and is forced to confront the question(s): (1) Is she first / foremost "a princess" herself _or_ "a race car driver, " and (2) what's exactly "a princess" (a nice / good behaved girl) supposed to be anyway. And as Vanellope tries to figure herself out, the _other_ Disney Princesses begin to re-evaluate their own understandings of themselves. SERIOUSLY the "Princess" scenes here are fascinating.
In the midst of this Ralph becomes somewhat confused: He's been trying to come up with ways to make some money on the internet so that he could buy that replacement steering wheel for his friend / charge Vanellope so that she could come back with him to the Video Arcade BUT even he's starting to see that Vanellope is really "finding life" / "new challenges / opportunities" _elsewhere_ ... inside this boundless universe of the Internet. SO ... what to do?
That's thematically the rest of the film. Honestly, the questions asked in the film are interesting. I just wish there wasn't such an age difference between Ralph and Vanallope. They have, I suppose a "step father / step daughter" or "mentor / mentee" relationship but it's not clear and honestly after a point I've started to be somewhat creeped-out by it.
So, honestly, as good as the film is on one one hand, on the other it's really more for the adults, the "Ralphs" of this world than for the Vanallopes / children of the world. And this is why I give it a lower rating than I initially would have.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)