Saturday, July 2, 2016

The BFG [2016]

MPAA (PG)  CNS/USCCB (A-I)  ChicagoTribune (3 Stars)  RogerEbert.com (3 1/2 Stars)  AVClub (C+)  Fr. Dennis (3 1/2 Stars)

IMDb listing
CNS/USCCB (K. Jensen) review
ChicagoTribune (M. Phillips) review
RogerEbert.com (M. Zoller Seitz) review
AVClub (A.A. Dowd) review


The BFG [2016] (directed by Steven Spielberg, screenplay by Melissa Mathison based on the children's book [GR] [WCat] [Amzn] by Roald Dahl [wikip] [GR] [WCat] [Amzn] [IMDb]) is a truly _excellent_ children's film that many parents / adults may very well enjoy as well.

Further, the reason why many adults may enjoy the film is very nice as well: Unlike many other children's oriented films made these days, it's not as if there's "a second level" in which to understand the film that would be geared more to the adults.  INSTEAD, as Matt Zoller Seitz writes in his review of the film for the website RogerEbert.com, the film invites Viewers to re-experience the world through the eyes of a kid. 

So the film begins with 8 year old orphan named Sophie (played wonderfully by Ruby Tarnhill) who can't seem to sleep one night.  So she's looking out the window of the orphanage in what seems to be 50s era London around three AM and ... to her _enormous surprise_ she spots an "older" 50-60 ft GIANT lumbering down the street. 

Now SHE'S scared because though GIANTS _do exist_ in the world of an eight year old, she _didn't_ really expect to run into one.  Then from the Giant's perspective (played again very, very nicely by Mark Rylance), he didn't expect to be spotted by her either.  Even though he's 50-60 ft tall, he'd only come to London late in the night, and with a very very dark cloak, and a cane that looked kinda like a streetlight, he'd make himself quite invisible to passerbys that encountered (first).  THERE'S A VERY, VERY CUTE / ENJOYABLE SEQUENCE in which we, the Viewers, (along with Sophie) watch this 50-60 ft GIANT quite gracefully avoid being spotted by five or six different passerbys.  The one thing that this kindly GIANT (what's he doing there? well it turns out that he has a fairly important job to do each night... No, I'm not going to tell you here, but it'd make perfect sense to a 5-10 year old) didn't expect was to be spotted / watched by the eight year old Sophie. 

So she's scared and he's scared and he just takes her up then to "Giant Country" where he lives to figure things out.  He may be A BIG GIANT, but not a particularly BRIGHT ONE ;-).  But if not all that bright, he turns to be remarkably kind.  Hence why Sophie comes to call him BFG or "Big Friendly Giant."

Now after Sophie wakes up the next morning up there with her new found friend, BFG, up in Giant Country, she finds that even GIANTS don't have it all that easy.  Indeed, there always seems to be "someone" EVEN BIGGER than they are.  So Sophie / we find that even the BFG finds himself picked-on by EVEN BIGGER GIANTS than he.

And who then better to help him THAN A KID (and even an ORPHAN KID) who knows a bit about being SMALL and yes, often, LONELY / ALONE ...

This is just a wonderful story folks ... and yes, much, much ensues ... ;-)


<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here?  If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation.  To donate just CLICK HERE.  Thank you! :-) >>

Friday, July 1, 2016

The Purge: Election Year [2016]

MPAA (R)  Fr. Dennis (1/2 Star)

IMDb listing


The Purge: Election Year [2016] (written and directed by James DeMonaco), the third in this base franchise is a film that I could not bring myself to watch. 

I did view and review the original film The Purge [2012] in the series.  However, I saw no positive value to viewing / reviewing the sequel that appeared a year later  And despite a certainly having a seductive title (of sorts) playing to frustration (and encouraging cynicism) in our country with the current state of our election process, I similarly could not find positive reason to view / review the current film. 

I do give the film 1/2 Star because I do believe that the franchise does apparently speak to a frustration existing today in society, otherwise I don't believe that the original film and its sequels would have had box office success to justify (financially) the continuation of the series.  I fully expect the current film "to do well" (financially).  I just do hope that the more-or-less inevitable fourth film will prove to be a flop.

Yes, there is frustration in the land.  But do we need to exploit it for monetary gain?  And if we do, does this not approach making a living through blood money?  Call this film (and the films of this series) essentially a kind of porn:  AT BEST these films "dissipate" anger / frustration present in their viewers.  AT WORST they may actually encourage more violent acting out in society and ALMOST CERTAINLY they _further_ degrade our consciences and further numb us to the shock of violence (making violent behavior appear ever more acceptable).

Folks, this is not a good slope to be going down...


<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here?  If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation.  To donate just CLICK HERE.  Thank you! :-) >>

Thursday, June 30, 2016

Legend of Tarzan [2016]

MPAA (PG-13)  Fr. Dennis (0 Stars)

IMDb listing


It's been several years that I've walked out of a movie.  I've done so twice -- Killer Joe [2012] and Sinister [2012].  Now surprisingly, with Legend of Tarzan [2016] (directed by David Yates, story and screenplay by Adam Cozad and Craig Brewer based, sort of, on the Tarzan stories [GR] [WCat] [Amzn] by Edgar Rice Burroughs [wikip] [GR] [WCat] [Amzn] [IMDb], lead role played by Alexander Skarsgård)

What the...?  Why the...?  Well the chief villain (played by Christoph Waltz) strangled people using his Rosary.  When about 45 minutes into the movie, after already doing so several times, he explains to Jane (played by Margot Robbie) that he got said Rosary from a priest friend when he was nine, she retorts: "You must have been close..."

I stayed dazed in the theater for about 5-10 minutes more and then said, "You know what, I'm done..."

Zero stars.   Indeed, for the second week in a row, as I asked with Independence Day: Resurgence [2016](though for different reasons) yet even more so here, can one give a film negative stars?  Both awful and sad.


<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here?  If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation.  To donate just CLICK HERE.  Thank you! :-) >>

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

The Shallows [2016]

MPAA (PG-13)  CNS/USCCB (A-III)  ChicagoTribune (2 Stars)  RogerEbert.com (3 Stars)  AVClub (C+)  Fr. Dennis (4 Stars)

IMDb listing
CNS/USCCB (K. Jensen) review
ChicagoTribune (M. Phillips) review
RogerEbert.com (M. Zoller-Seitz) review
AVClub (I. Vishnevetsky) review  


The Shallows [2016] (directed by Jaume Collet-Serra, screenplay by Anthony Jaswinski) is ... an EVER ENTERTAINING but ALSO   SURPRISINGLY INTELLIGENT -- "SUMMER SHARK" MOVIE ;-).  

I say EVER ENTERTAINING because I _jumped_ "early and often" during the course of the film that was often spectacularly shot in the "small indie" / "surfing documentary" idiom (honestly, the cinematography alone is worth going to see the film).

And I call this film _surprisingly intelligent_ because though made in said "small indie" rather than "Blockbuster" fashion, (hence for a fraction of the cost of Jaws [1975], the film that one would have thought was "the shark movie to end all shark movies," THE "shark movie" that arguably "jumped its own shark" ;-) ... the current film is arguably MORE INTELLIGENT than Jaws [1975].

Honestly, the current film could be thought of as Steven Spielberg's name-making blockbuster Jaws [1975] meeting a surprising / updated retelling of Ernest Hemingway's classic Old Man and the Sea [wikip] [GR] [WCat] [Amzn] [IMDb], featuring instead of "an old bearded man in a boat trying to reel-in a fish," a bikini clad medical student named Nancy (played honestly magnificently by Blake Lively) trying to take down a shark. 

Indeed the film could be thought of  as "the revenge of the stupid / arguably 'immoral' utterly anonymous woman who gets "munched" in the opening sequence of Jaws (while carelessly going 'skinny dipping', alone, in the sea at the end of some random beach-side party).  In contrast, Blake Lively's late-20 something surfing medical student Nancy is _anything_ but stupid / careless or immoral (indeed, let's just being by saying that SHE'S GIVEN A NAME...)  Yes, she finds herself alone 200 yards out from a secluded ("secret") beach somewhere in Mexico.  However, that's because she wants to take-in "one last wave" before calling it a day.  And she's at the beach to begin with, in good part, to grieve for her mother who had died recently of cancer. 

Blake Lively's Nancy is thus quite similar to Reese Witherspoon's character in Wild [2014] ... trying to "do what she loves" (in this case surf) to get herself out of her grief.  And that she would have gravitated toward a more secluded ("secret") beach to do this, given her circumstances would even make sense ... people generally don't like to grieve "in public" ...

Anyway, while she tries to take-in that "one last wave" on that fateful late afternoon ... she gets "knocked off her surf board" (and even bitten) ... by a (it turns out, one rather "driven" / "single minded") shark ... some 200 yards from shore, and much then ensues over the subsequent several days ...

Honestly, a quite excellent film and on several levels ;-)

Good / great job! ;-)


<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here?  If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation.  To donate just CLICK HERE.  Thank you! :-) >>
 

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Invention for Destruction (orig. Vynález Skázy previously released as The Fabulous World of Jules Verne) [1958/2015]

MPAA (UR would be PG)  Fr. Dennis (4+ Stars)

IMDb listing
CSFD listing*
FDb.cz listing*

aVoir-aLire (V. Dumez) review*
Moria Sci-Fi, Horror, Fantasy Review (R. Scheib) review

FilmServer.cz (V. Limberk) review*

Invention for Destruction (orig. Vynález Skázy previously released as The Fabulous World of Jules Verne) [1958 / 2015] [IMDB] [CSFD]*[FDb]* (directed and screenplay cowritten by Karel Zeman [wikip] [IMDb] [CSFD]*[FDb]*, along with František Hrubín [IMDB] [CSFD]* [FDb]* dialogues by Milan Vácha [IMDb] [FDb]* based on the story Facing the Flag (orig. Face au Drapeau) [GR] [WCat] [Amzn] by Jules Vernes [wikip] [GR] [IMDb] [CSFD]* is a TRULY REMARKABLE 1950s-era Czech combined animated / live-action gem that was _solemnly_ re-released digital restored form at the 2015 Karlovy Vary International Film Festival* and has subsequently been made available in said digital restored form on DVD (available on Amazon) for a reasonable price.  The film played recently at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago as part of the 2016 Czech That Film Tour organized annually by the Czech Ministry of Culture and the Czech Diplomatic Mission to the United States.  Indeed, presenting the film at the Friday 6/24 screening here in Chicago was Ludmila Zeman, the legengary director's daughter.

Often today we tend to think of Science Fiction, especially Sci-Fi film to be almost an exclusive province of the United States.  Films like the current one here are a reminder of the VARIETY of SciFi visions available once one gets past our borders.  And it is a _lovely_ trip.  Over the years, I've reviewed fair amount of foreign SciFi films including Upside Down [2013] from Argentina, Blue Desert (orig. Deserto Azul) [2013] from Brazil, Melancholia [2011] by Denmark's Lars von Trier, the Twilight-Zonish The Similars (orig. Los Parecidos) [2015] by Mexico's Isaac Ezban, and the Russian sci-fi films Calculator (orig. Вычислитель / Vychislitel) [2014]Hard to be a God (orig. Трудно быть Богом) [2013] and  Under Electric Clouds (orig. Под электрическими облаками / Pod elektricheskimi oblakami) [2015].  All these films expand our horizons of what's possible in the genre.

And the current film, black and white, done with a truly marvelous mix of 1950s-era animation and live action, and doing so in a manner that respects, spectacularly, the style of the illustrations in Jules Verne's novels, arguably ANTICIPATES the Ian Flemming inspired James Bond films of the 1960s.

What's the plot of this story?  A scientist, Professor Roch (played by Arnošt Navrátil [IMDb] [CSFD]*[FDb]*) is kidnapped by an evil pirate / capitalist / industrialist Artigas (played by Miloslav Holub [IMDb] [CSFD]* [FDb]*) taking him to a far off island with a giant volcano where he forces the scientist build him a weapon of unimaginable destruction, and it's up to the French Navy to come in to save the Day.  Okay, switch the French Navy to the British Agent 007 and move the story by 75 years or so and this becomes the plot to essentially Ian Flemming's Dr. No [book 1958 , film 1962]].

So yes, this becomes a fascinating film to look-up for _all kinds_ of historical, technical, thematic reasons.  And typical of the era, it's not even too long -- about 78 minutes ;-) -- SO it's not even that big of a risk to take ;-) ... and once it starts, I'm _positive_ that most film lovers will just watch this remarkable film with jaw dropped fascination.

Technically, it really is that good and then when one thinks that thematically this story / film could have ANTICIPATED some of the James Bond novels / films that followed, it just becomes all the more remarkable.

Thanks for making this part of this already quite remarkable Czech That Film Series!



* Foreign language webpages are most easily translated using Google's Chrome Browser. 

 << NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here?  If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation.  To donate just CLICK HERE.  Thank you! :-) >>

Václav Havel - A Life of Freedom [2014] (Život podle Václava Havla)

MPAA (UR / PG-13)  Fr. Dennis (3 1/2 Stars)

IMDb listing
CSFD.cz listing*
FDB.cz listing*
DocumentaryAlliance listing

Blesk.cz (ČTK) review*
ČeskáTelevize,cz (M. Třešňáková) review*
iDnes (M. Spáčilová) review*
informuji.cz (T. Pavelcová) review*


Václav Havel - A Life for Freedom [2014] (Život podle Václava Havla) [2014] [IMDb] [CSFD]*[FDb]* [DA] (directed by Andrea Sedláčková [IMDb] [CSFD]* [FDB]* [DA]) is a solid CZECH / FRENCH made at least in part "for TV" documentary about the life of Czech playwright, former Czech dissident then Czechoslovak afterwards Czech President and certainly Czech national hero Václav Havel [wikip] [IMDb].  A natural (and naturally _crowd pleasing_) part of the 2016 Czech That Film Tour organized annually by the Czech Ministry of Culture and the Czech Diplomatic Mission to the United States, it played recently at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago.  Honestly, what would a "Czech Film Tour" without an entry like this?   It's natural, it's honest.  Václav Havel simply means _a lot_ to the Czechs as a sort of literary/dramatic Jackie Robinson [wikip] crossed with Martin Luther King, Jr. [wikip]

So what does this documentary add that hasn't been already said about Václav Havel?   A non-Czech viewer who may not know much about Vaclav Havel would find the documentary blessedly light and hence accessible.  The main points of Havel's life are covered: 

He was born in 1936 to a quite wealthy Czech bourgeois family that was already focused on the arts, and then on specifically the "pop" or "commercial-arts."  In the 1920s, the Havel family built a state-of-the-art cultural complex The Lucerna (Lantern) on Wenceslas Square in Prague (basically Prague's main square and along with Národní Třida its Champs Élysées).  To this day, The Lucerna (Lantern) has remained a frequented cultural center with shops / cafés, a stunning art deco style multiplex movie theater and a state-of-the-art jazz club (I've been to both the beautiful movie theater and to the jazz club more than a few times during my visits to Prague).  The family also built Prague's famous Berrandov Studios in the hills at the south-east end of the city, which have been graced by the likes of Tom Cruise and Matt Damon in the years after the fall of communism as both some of the Mission Impossible and Bourne Identity movies have been filmed there. 

With the coming into power of the Communists in post-WW II Czechoslovakia in their Putsch of 1948, all this was taken from the family and like those of his class, Vaclav was initially _sentenced_ to a life of _programmed_ obscurity.  Denied _as a matter of course_ (regardless of ability or grades) to entry into a University, he was initially put on a track to become a carpenter and when he proved fearful of heights was transferred into a program that would have made him a laboratory technician.  But an artist he was.  So even as a teenager in a vocational program to become said carpenter / later lab technician, he started writing poetry.  Later he got involved in an unofficial drama group.  In the early 1960s, he caught notice of Czech writers and was invited speak at one of their Congresses.  With little to lose, he came to be appreciated at said Congresses for his bravery in saying things that "the official writers" could not.  In the late 1960s (when Czechoslovakia was liberalizing) he had an opportunity to visit the United States (not unlike Chinese dissident Ai WeiWei in the years prior to Tienanmen), came to enjoy the Peace Marches / hippie lifestyle, and returned to Czechoslovakia just in time for the August 1968 Soviet invasion which crushed this all for 20 years in his home country.

In the mid-1970s, he became a prominent defender of what would have otherwise been simply an obscure Czechoslovakian punk-rock band that called itself "The Plastic People of the Universe" but which found itself persecuted by the Communist authorities simply because its music and its musings were so strange.  Out of his and other soon-to-become artist "dissidents" came the famous Charter 1977 where said artists / writers made a written stand in favor of Freedom, above all of simple Freedom of Expression.  That earned Havel various years of prison and house arrest.  Fascinating photos and home movie clips are presented in the current documentary.

Then in 1989, he the leader of the Charistas became the natural leader of the Opposition that brought down the Communist government in Czechoslovakia and was then subsequently elected leader of first post-Communist Czechoslovakia and later when the country broke-up into the Czech and Slovak Republics, was elected repeated the President of the Czech Republic.

Yet an artist (playwright) at heart, his presidency was ever fascinating.  Upon being elected Czechoslovakia's first post-Communist (by the still Communist legislature) after giving the shortest inaugural speech in 40 years (1 1/2 minutes ;-), he simply crossed from the Presidential Palace at Prague's Castle into its main square to go to Prague's St. Vitus Cathedral, where he asked for and received a blessing from Prague's Cardinal Tomášek (Havel was not Catholic, but it seemed to him the right thing to do).   Footage of the Cardinal's blessing is shown in the documentary. 

Then his presidential court was always filled with interesting people.  Among the first dignitaries invited by Havel to Prague in those heady times after the fall of Communism were: (1) The Pope John Paul II, (2) The Dalai Lama and (3) Frank Zappa ;-).  Footage of visits to Havel's residence at Prague's Castle by the Dalai Lama and (separately) the Rolling Stones ;-) was shown in the documentary as well.

The film ended with footage from Vaclav Havel's only stab at making a film (remember he was born into a family that had built and owned Prague's Berrandov Studios), the film leaving Leaving (orig. Odchazeni) [2011] which he made/directed in the last years of his life after leaving the Presidency and in which he has his second wife, actress Dagmar "Dásha" Veškrnová-Havlová ÍMDb] [CSFD]
playing a lead role).  I had seen (and reviewed) the film when it played at the 2012 version of this Czech Film Tour ;-), and it was typical of Havel's and really post-WWII / Cold War era Central European playwriting ;-).  

Vaclav Havel was truly a remarkable man -- yes, an intellectual/dissident, later a President, but also honestly "a fun guy" (and yes, something of a womanizer as well ... which does sort of go hand-in-hand with with "being a fun guy" ... ;-)

Anyway, non-Czechs wanting to know something about Vaclav Havel would probably like this film because it is, in fact, quite light.  It dutifully presents the above biography of the man, but does so lightly and characteristically with some humor.

And many of the Czech critics (listed above) gave the documentary relatively high marks for "blessedly not including a lot of talking heads" ;-).  Again, the film is composed almost entirely of archival footage and photos, with voice-over (subtitled into English) by the director herself.  The advantage of this format (to a Czech audience) was obvious -- to many Czechs, Václav Havel [wikip] [IMDb] is almost like a family member.  Hence there really was no need (for the Czechs anyway) to have "a bunch of talking heads" expounding on his importance (or failings, etc).  We already know him / he's already "family" ;-),  For us, the film's like going through a family album ;-).

Anyway, great job! ;-)


* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser. 

<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here?  If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation.  To donate just CLICK HERE.  Thank you! :-) >>
 

Friday, June 24, 2016

Independence Day: Resurgence [2016]

MPAA (PG-13)  CNS/USCCB (A-III)  ChicagoTribune (1 Star)  RogerEbert.com (1 1/2 Stars)  AVClub (C+)  Fr. Dennis (0 even NEGATIVE Stars)

IMDb listing
CNS/USCCB (K. Jensen) review
ChicagoTribune (M. Phillips) review
RogerEbert.com (C. Lemire) review
AVClub (I. Vishnevetsky) review


Let's begin by admitting what becomes obvious:  Independence Day: Resurgence [2016] (directed by Roland Emmerich, screenplay by Nicolas Wright, James A. Woods, Dean Devlin, Roland Emmerich  and James Vanderbilt, story by Dean Devlin, Roland Emmerich, Nicolas Wright and James A. Woods, based on characters created by Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin) is AT BEST a _silly movie_, having far more in common with the "Sharknado" movies than more conventional disaster movies, even including the recent earthquake / tsunami movie San Andreas [2015] which I did actually see (but apparently did not bother to review ;-) or other post-original Independence Day [1996] alien invasion movies like the recent The 5th Wave [2016] (which I did see / review ;-).  AT WORST it's even worse than that... a waste of time.

Folks, that's really the choice that you'll have to make: Is this film simply "silly" / "stupid" like perhaps Snakes on a Plane [2006] or is it even worse than that?

The principal flaw in this "twenty years later" sequel to the original Independence Day [1996] is that the alien invasion envisioned in the original so devastated our planet that it'd be NEXT TO IMPOSSIBLE to envision the world recovering as fast as it appeared to in the sequel.  Indeed, A FAR MORE INTERESTING FILM (INDEED _SERIES_) WOULD HAVE FOLLOWED THE RECOVERY OF THE WORLD AFTER THE REPELLING OF THE ALIEN INVASION IN THE FIRST MOVIE.

To understand, let us remember the devastation wreaked on the Earth in the first movie: The OPENING SALVO of that Alien Invasion OBLITERATED New York, Washington DC and Los Angeles (in the U.S. alone, with similar coordinated attacks obliterating similar cities across Europe, the Americas and Asia).  In _trying_ to repel or at least "cause damage" to the invasion fleet WE OURSELVES BLEW-UP HOUSTON with an H-BOMB _to no effect_ on the invasion fleet.  (At the end of that film, we ended up gaining the upper-hand through managing to insert some sort of a computer virus into the invasion fleet's coordinating mechanism that rendered the invasion fleet "dead in the ... air / space" ;-).

But the Damage was done.  While NOT IMPOSSIBLE, it'd be hard to imagine the level of "Emergency Management" / Societal Coordination and SOCIETAL BUY-IN that would be required to REBUILD after such an attack.

And then there'd be a question of WHAT TO REBUILD -- HONESTLY:  DO WE REBUILD SOCIETY TO BE WHAT IT WAS LIKE _BEFORE_ (basically consumerist driven to promote the happiness of society's individual members) OR ... (HONESTLY) DO WE REBUILD THE MILITARY AT A FRENETIC PACE (yes cannibalizing any / all captured alien technology) TO SIMPLY PREPARE FOR A SECOND ATTACK.

TYPICAL OF OUR MINDSET TODAY ... the current film REFUSES to make _that choice_.

So, instead we're presented with a rebuilt Washington D.C. that looks like a Sci-Fi UTOPIAN vision of what Washington D.C. _could look like_ three centuries from now.  Additionally, we're told that we have a base on the Moon and EVEN SOMEWHERE BY SATURN (remember this would be 20 years after the initial 1996 attack, that is TODAY).

That is UTTER NONSENSE.  AT OUR WILDEST BEST, we'd be looking like late 1950s-early 1960s era West Germany (or perhaps 1950s-early 60s era SOVIET UNION ... they had to rebuild on their own ... W. Germany got assistance FROM US... we'd get assistance from NOBODY), with still LOTS of LEFT-OVER RUINS and ALL KINDS OF OTHER PHYSICAL / PSYCHIC SCARS ALL AROUND.

IT'S ALL NONSENSE, NONSENSE, NONSENSE.  Perhaps though we could have come up with a way to use "alien technology" to just start "throwing sharks" at the second alien invasion fleet ;-) 

A "shark laser pulse gun" (whatever that would be) would be _as realistic_ and _probably more effective_ than the current film's impressive sounding BUT UTTERLY STUPID "cold fusion bombs" ... LOL ;-).

AT BEST "Cold Fusion" would provide us with "a free" means to WARM A CUP OF COFFEE (useful BUT ...).  Maybe A MASSIVE "COLD FUSION REACTOR" OR, BETTER, A MASSIVE ARRAY OF SMALL PARALLEL "COLD FUSION REACTORS" could produce a _lot of_ "net heat" that with something like a low-boiling freon cycle could be converted into ELECTRICITY that in turn _could_ be used to power some kind of LASER.  BUT A BOMB (!!)  NO, NOT IN THIS UNIVERSE !!!! 

The "old fashioned 1950s era 100 MT H-bombs" LOTS AND LOTS OF THEM would PERHAPS be able to "do something" ... if one could get through the alien force shields.  And then one would want to set them off hundreds of millions of miles from Earth.

Closer to home ... I'd bet on those sharks ... ;-)

So folks, MY DECISION IS MADE.  IMHO this was an _unbelievably stupid movie_ ... and honestly the star-studded cast deserved better than this.  Can one give a film NEGATIVE STARS? ;-)


< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here?  If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation.  To donate just CLICK HERE.  Thank you! :-) >