MPAA (UR would be R) aVaL (3.5 Stars) LaCroix (3.5 Stars) LeMonde (3 Stars) L'Express (2 Stars) FemmeActuelle (1 1/2 Stars) Fr. Dennis (3 Stars)
IMDb listing
Allociné.fr listing*
aVoir-aLire.org (F. Mignard) review*
La Croix (C. Renou-Nativel) review*
L'Express (E. Libiot) review*
Le Monde (F. Nouchi) review*
Femme Actuelle (C. Bernheim) review*
Gemma Bovery [2014] [IMDb] [AC.fr]* (directed and screenplay cowritten by Anne Fontaine [IMDb] [AC.fr]* along with Pascal Bonitzer [IMDb] [AC.fr]* based on the contemporary novel by the same name (published in 2000) [GR] [WCat] [Amzn] by Posy Simmonds [GR] [WCat] [Amzn] in turn inspired by the 19th century French language classic novel Madame Bovary [en.wikip] [GR] [WCat] [Amzn] [IMDb] [AC.fr]* by Gustave Flaubert [wikip] [GR] [Amzn]) is a very well-made, often very funny French "dramedy" that played recently at the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago.
In the film that like the original Mde. Bovary plays out in "provincial Normandy", mild-mannered (and, truth be told, initially quite bored) Martin Joubert (played wonderfully throughout by Fabrice Luchini [IMDb] [AC.fr]*) who had previously had "a life of excitement" out in Paris, but had returned back some 10 years previous with his wife Valérie (played by Isabelle Candelier [IMDb] [AC.fr]*) and now teenage son (played by Kacey Mottet Klein [IMDb] [AC.fr]*) to help-out and then take-over his dad's small-town bakery, discovers to his surprise that the neighbor's house had been bought by a 30-something couple English couple named Charlie (played by Jason Flemyng [IMDb] [AC.fr]*) and Gemma Bovery (played by Gemma Arterton [IMDb] [AC.fr]*).
Noting immediately the name, okay, its spelling was one letter off, but also their appearance and lifestyle -- she was an artist, he some kind of an arts dealer / restorer -- poor 50-something mild-mannered "baker" Martin Joubert declared, in a voice-over, recounting to viewers the story: "I knew that 10 years of sexual tranquility were over." And indeed they were ...
Now it wasn't as if HE was destined to have an affair with this generally kind / charming and with each passing scene ever more sexually EXPLOSIVE Gemma Bovery -- to her he was just a kindly (perhaps even somewhat odd) _old_ man who lived next door and ran the bakery (along WITH HIS WIFE) where she'd buy her bread each morning -- but she DID soon enough strike-up a truly TORRID and ultimately ART-PIECE SHATTERING (note again that her husband was an "art restorer ...") affair with a _rich_, "easy on the eyes" 20-something year old named Hervé (de Bressigny) (played again magnificently by Niels Schneider [IMDb] [AC.fr]*) who lived, yes, in a palatial "chateau" nearby. Poor husband Charlie, and odd/previously bored neighbor Martin for that matter ... they didn't stand a chance ...
Then, a past lover of Charlie / Gemma's age, Patrick (played by Mel Raido [IMDb] [AC.fr]*) passes through as well.
Now this is just WAY TO MUCH, ahem, "energy" concentrating in WAY TOO SMALL OF A PLACE (all this was playing-out in-and-around a TINY, OTHERWISE UTTERLY NON-DESCRIPT TOWN in otherwise "sleepy" Normandy) SO THIS COULDN'T POSSIBLY END WELL ... and it doesn't.
Now throughout the story, Gemma keeps being startled by "field mice" both outside and more problematically inside her home. And she keeps saying that she has to "go to town" to get some "poison" to get rid of them to which the older (perhaps wiser but mostly _odd_) neighbor Martin KEEPS TELLING HER "NO, _YOU_ don't want to be buying any arsenic" (That's how in the classic novel Madame Bovary finally kills herself... ;-). So Gemma DOES NOT ... but (mild spoiler alert) SHE does die anyway ...
HOW Gemma dies is both terribly tragic but also, for those who see the movie, honestly "kinda funny."
But six months later, Martin's teenage son informs him that a new couple was moving into the neighboring house where Boverys had just lived the previous summer. They're Russian ... guess their names: They are the Kalenins ;-).
The film's not for everybody ... But a few older past "lit. majors" would certainly get a kick out of it ;-). A good and very clever job! ;-)
* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If
you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6
_non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To
donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
Reviews of current films written by Fr. Dennis Zdenek Kriz, OSM of St. Philip Benizi Parish, Fullerton, CA
Saturday, March 14, 2015
Friday, March 13, 2015
Cinderella [2015]
MPAA (PG) CNS/USCCB (A-I) ChicagoTribune (3 Stars) RE.com (3 Stars) AVClub (C+) Fr. Dennis (1 Star)
IMDb listing
CNS/USCCB (J. McAleer) review
ChicagoTribune (M. Phillips) review
RogerEbert.com (S. Wloszczyna) review
AVClub (I. Vishnevetsky) review
Cinderella [2015] (directed by Kenneth Branagh screenplay by Chris Weitz based on the European Fairy Tale best known by that name [wikip]) gets credit from many of the above listed critics for "for once" "playing it straight" with the story.
Yet, I'd honestly beg to differ. I found both the set design and costuming about as _over-the-top_ ostentatious / STUPIDLY "frilly" (honestly, can one say, no shout "FAAAABUULOUUS...") as I've seen in years, fit far more for Rio de Janeiro's annual Carnivale than for the retelling of a Central European story about THE HUMBLE (if put-upon) little heroine of the _Tales of the Brothers Grimm_.
And while I understand that various tellings of the story have portrayed Cinderella's Evil Stepmother (played here by Cate Blanchett) and Stepsisters (played here by Sophie McShera and Holliday Granger) as "cheap / gaudy", honestly this version has the main difference between Cinderella (played here by Lily James) and her new, forced-upon-her family, being simply that Cinderella certainly had "better hair." ;-).
Add to this the UTTERLY THROWAWAY / STUPID "flourish" that the Stepmother's CAT was named "Lucifer" (!?!) and one wonders what the heck were the film-makers thinking ...
Positively, the film portrayed the kingdom in which the story played out as race neutral. So there were darker complected characters scattered throughout the cast.
YET even here, it actually also turns out that the "real rival" to still blond haired / blue eyed Cinderella for the Prince's (played by Richard Madden) affections in this film was _an added_ dark haired/brown eyed, darker-skinned princess named "Chelina" (played by Jana Perez) "from Zaragoza" (read HISPANIC...). One wonders how many DECADES more we'll have to wait before CINDER-(meaning ASHEN)-ella will be played by a humble DARKER-complected girl rather than a blonde playing the character in a kind of fairytale "blackface" ...
So I guess I really didn't like the film ... ;-) ... And I will note that there is a strange irony in traditional Hollywood renderings of the Grimm Fairytales: "Snow White" is generally played by a brown eyed / dark-haired girl while Cinder-(Ashen)-ella is played generally by blue-eyed blonde. Go figure ...
But above all, I found the "Baroque" / "Rule Britannia" over-the-top frivolity of the costuming/set design of this film most difficult to bear. Perhaps it all "looked better in 3D" (I saw it in two) ... but the appalling gaudiness of the film would probably make even the makers of the recent remake of The Great Gatsby [2013] (where the _decadence_ of the 1920s era was _part of that tale's point_) blush.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
IMDb listing
CNS/USCCB (J. McAleer) review
ChicagoTribune (M. Phillips) review
RogerEbert.com (S. Wloszczyna) review
AVClub (I. Vishnevetsky) review
Cinderella [2015] (directed by Kenneth Branagh screenplay by Chris Weitz based on the European Fairy Tale best known by that name [wikip]) gets credit from many of the above listed critics for "for once" "playing it straight" with the story.
Yet, I'd honestly beg to differ. I found both the set design and costuming about as _over-the-top_ ostentatious / STUPIDLY "frilly" (honestly, can one say, no shout "FAAAABUULOUUS...") as I've seen in years, fit far more for Rio de Janeiro's annual Carnivale than for the retelling of a Central European story about THE HUMBLE (if put-upon) little heroine of the _Tales of the Brothers Grimm_.
And while I understand that various tellings of the story have portrayed Cinderella's Evil Stepmother (played here by Cate Blanchett) and Stepsisters (played here by Sophie McShera and Holliday Granger) as "cheap / gaudy", honestly this version has the main difference between Cinderella (played here by Lily James) and her new, forced-upon-her family, being simply that Cinderella certainly had "better hair." ;-).
Add to this the UTTERLY THROWAWAY / STUPID "flourish" that the Stepmother's CAT was named "Lucifer" (!?!) and one wonders what the heck were the film-makers thinking ...
Positively, the film portrayed the kingdom in which the story played out as race neutral. So there were darker complected characters scattered throughout the cast.
YET even here, it actually also turns out that the "real rival" to still blond haired / blue eyed Cinderella for the Prince's (played by Richard Madden) affections in this film was _an added_ dark haired/brown eyed, darker-skinned princess named "Chelina" (played by Jana Perez) "from Zaragoza" (read HISPANIC...). One wonders how many DECADES more we'll have to wait before CINDER-(meaning ASHEN)-ella will be played by a humble DARKER-complected girl rather than a blonde playing the character in a kind of fairytale "blackface" ...
So I guess I really didn't like the film ... ;-) ... And I will note that there is a strange irony in traditional Hollywood renderings of the Grimm Fairytales: "Snow White" is generally played by a brown eyed / dark-haired girl while Cinder-(Ashen)-ella is played generally by blue-eyed blonde. Go figure ...
But above all, I found the "Baroque" / "Rule Britannia" over-the-top frivolity of the costuming/set design of this film most difficult to bear. Perhaps it all "looked better in 3D" (I saw it in two) ... but the appalling gaudiness of the film would probably make even the makers of the recent remake of The Great Gatsby [2013] (where the _decadence_ of the 1920s era was _part of that tale's point_) blush.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
Thursday, March 12, 2015
White God (orig. Fehér Isten) [2014]
MPAA (UR would be PG-13) The Guardian (4/5 Stars) Irish Times (4/5 Stars) Fr. Dennis (3 Stars)
IMDb listing
EuroCinema.org listing
HMDb listing*
Port.hu listing*
Irish Times (D. Clarke) review
TheGuardian.co.uk (P. Bradshaw) review
The Hollywood Reporter (S. Dalton) review
Variety (G. Lodge) review
White God (orig. Fehér Isten) [2014] [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu]* (directed and cowritten by Kornél Mundruczó [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu] along with Viktória Petrányi [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu] and Kata Wéber [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu]) Cannes' 2014 Un Certain Regard award winning film from Hungary is certainly one of the most compelling if also disturbing films I've seen since beginning my blog four years ago. Yes, like the 1960s era The Planet of the Apes films, the movie is an obvious parable about anti-Semitism / racism (of all kinds of stripes) that has plagued Central Europe for ages, BUT ... the targets of abuse in this film are ... DOGS, yes OFTEN CUTE AS CAN BE DOGS, but DOGS nonetheless. And THAT will disturb a lot of people watching this film (as if a film series about "the rise of the APES" would somehow be less disturbing...).
Seriously I GET THE FILM. I think it's certainly well intentioned and at times FUN (the screening as part of the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center WAS PACKED WITH SMILING FROM EAR-TO-EAR mostly ART STUDENTS from the nearby Art Institute of Chicago of which the GSFC is part) ... BUT, BUT, BUT, BUT ... do I really want to entertain employing DOGS (as CUTE, CUTE, CUTE as they can be AT TIMES) TO SYMBOLIZE the TARGETS OF RACISM??? Dogs as a symbol are ... well, rather POLYVALENT. Sigh ...
So how does this compelling if fairly disturbing film then play out?
Thirteen year old Lili (played by Zsófia Psotta [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu]), a child of divorce, is shunted-over by her mother to her father for the summer while she flies with her new beau to Australia on some several month long academic assignment over there. Besides her backpack, Lili is transferred over to her father with two items of import -- her cute as can be Labrador Retriever mutt named Hagan and her trumpet. Both play key roles in the film.
Her father appears in favor of her having taken-on a musical interest (she appears part of a student orchestra, so it gives her "something to do during the summer..."). However, her dog, Hagan, proves to be a bigger problem:
First, it seems that her father doesn't particularly like dogs to begin with. Then, he lives in an apartment building where dogs aren't supposed to be present. Finally, he goes through the roof when it appears that his EX-WIFE apparently hasn't paid-up the license fee for the dog. Apparently dog license fees in Budapest are quite high and almost nobody chooses to pay them UNLESS they have a "pure bread" and ... Hagan's a mutt. Further, he's a mutt THAT HIS EX "bought" for his daughter and THERE WAS NO WAY THAT HE WAS GOING TO PAY THE RATHER EXPENSIVE LICENSE FEE FOR A DOG THAT "REALLY WAS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF HIS EX-WIFE" ... THE ONE WHO'S NOW WITH HER "NEW GUY" ... SOMEWHERE OUT IN AUSTRALIA (!).
But there's his thirteen year old daughter Lili in his apartment with her "illegal dog" and his EX was _literally 10,000 miles away_ and, inevitably, a "nosey neighbor" _chooses_ to be "unhappy" about the presence of the dog.
What to do? After a few days of harboring a dog that the other residents don't seem to want around, who at that moment ENCAPSULATED EVERYTHING that had infuriated him about his ex-wife, daughter or no daughter, he decides to _ditch the dog_, basically parking his car at a park (far away) one morning and leaving Hagan there.
This of course is quite upsetting to Lily, his thirteen year old, BUT he saw no other reasonable solution. He didn't like the dog, the dog was even LESS LIKED by his dog-averse neighbors, and the DOG, Hagan, represented EVERYTHING THAT HE FOUND ANNOYING ABOUT HIS EX-WIFE, who arguably DUMPED him along with Lily at his doorstep while she flew-off with her new boyfriend to Australia! Argh!
Well, that may be how Lily's father thought of Hagan, Lily's dog, but Hagan then had a life of his own ... and that's then the rest of the film ...
Dumped then in some Budapest park far from ANY familiar surroundings, and certainly far from Lily, Hagan eventually gives up trying to find his past owner (even as she keeps looking for him). Eventually he runs into other stray dogs ... and eventually he and the other stray dogs get into trouble with local, Budapest, "Animal control" who attempt to round-up the dogs.
Hagan escapes the initial round-up by "Animal Control," but is then _sold_ by a local homeless person to some lowlife running a "dog fighting ring." Poor Hagan ESCAPES that sadist only to be caught then for real by "Animal Control." Yet, just before being Euthanized, he uses his acquired dog-fighting skills to make a quick break out of the dog pound, AND ... helps about a hundred other dogs flee pound as well.
SO ... "Dogs of Budapest UNITE, you have nothing to lose but your ... LEASHES ;-)" Soon Hagan is at the forefront of a Budapest-wide dog rebellion ;-) and pretty much ALL those who would have mistreated those poor mutts ... start getting their due.
But what of 13-year-old Lily? At the beginning of the summer ALL THAT SHE "REALLY HAD" was her dog Hagan (who was taken from her) ... and her trumpet. Well, of course, she has to play a key role now ... ;-)
Again, a it's pretty cool film ... it's just a fair number of the scenes in the film will be unsettling / disturbing to a fair number of viewers. And what is the film really about? Is it "just about dogs?" Or is it about a lot more than that? And if it is about "more than just dogs" ... How comfortable are you really, that the film makers _chose_ to make _dogs_ even OFTEN CUTE DOGS represent THE TARGETS OF OPPRESSION AMONG US.
Again, this is one COMPELLING / THOUGHT-PROVOKING if also DISTURBING film!
Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
IMDb listing
EuroCinema.org listing
HMDb listing*
Port.hu listing*
Irish Times (D. Clarke) review
TheGuardian.co.uk (P. Bradshaw) review
The Hollywood Reporter (S. Dalton) review
Variety (G. Lodge) review
White God (orig. Fehér Isten) [2014] [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu]* (directed and cowritten by Kornél Mundruczó [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu] along with Viktória Petrányi [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu] and Kata Wéber [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu]) Cannes' 2014 Un Certain Regard award winning film from Hungary is certainly one of the most compelling if also disturbing films I've seen since beginning my blog four years ago. Yes, like the 1960s era The Planet of the Apes films, the movie is an obvious parable about anti-Semitism / racism (of all kinds of stripes) that has plagued Central Europe for ages, BUT ... the targets of abuse in this film are ... DOGS, yes OFTEN CUTE AS CAN BE DOGS, but DOGS nonetheless. And THAT will disturb a lot of people watching this film (as if a film series about "the rise of the APES" would somehow be less disturbing...).
Seriously I GET THE FILM. I think it's certainly well intentioned and at times FUN (the screening as part of the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center WAS PACKED WITH SMILING FROM EAR-TO-EAR mostly ART STUDENTS from the nearby Art Institute of Chicago of which the GSFC is part) ... BUT, BUT, BUT, BUT ... do I really want to entertain employing DOGS (as CUTE, CUTE, CUTE as they can be AT TIMES) TO SYMBOLIZE the TARGETS OF RACISM??? Dogs as a symbol are ... well, rather POLYVALENT. Sigh ...
So how does this compelling if fairly disturbing film then play out?
Thirteen year old Lili (played by Zsófia Psotta [IMDb] [CEu] [HMDb]* [Pt.hu]), a child of divorce, is shunted-over by her mother to her father for the summer while she flies with her new beau to Australia on some several month long academic assignment over there. Besides her backpack, Lili is transferred over to her father with two items of import -- her cute as can be Labrador Retriever mutt named Hagan and her trumpet. Both play key roles in the film.
Her father appears in favor of her having taken-on a musical interest (she appears part of a student orchestra, so it gives her "something to do during the summer..."). However, her dog, Hagan, proves to be a bigger problem:
First, it seems that her father doesn't particularly like dogs to begin with. Then, he lives in an apartment building where dogs aren't supposed to be present. Finally, he goes through the roof when it appears that his EX-WIFE apparently hasn't paid-up the license fee for the dog. Apparently dog license fees in Budapest are quite high and almost nobody chooses to pay them UNLESS they have a "pure bread" and ... Hagan's a mutt. Further, he's a mutt THAT HIS EX "bought" for his daughter and THERE WAS NO WAY THAT HE WAS GOING TO PAY THE RATHER EXPENSIVE LICENSE FEE FOR A DOG THAT "REALLY WAS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF HIS EX-WIFE" ... THE ONE WHO'S NOW WITH HER "NEW GUY" ... SOMEWHERE OUT IN AUSTRALIA (!).
But there's his thirteen year old daughter Lili in his apartment with her "illegal dog" and his EX was _literally 10,000 miles away_ and, inevitably, a "nosey neighbor" _chooses_ to be "unhappy" about the presence of the dog.
What to do? After a few days of harboring a dog that the other residents don't seem to want around, who at that moment ENCAPSULATED EVERYTHING that had infuriated him about his ex-wife, daughter or no daughter, he decides to _ditch the dog_, basically parking his car at a park (far away) one morning and leaving Hagan there.
This of course is quite upsetting to Lily, his thirteen year old, BUT he saw no other reasonable solution. He didn't like the dog, the dog was even LESS LIKED by his dog-averse neighbors, and the DOG, Hagan, represented EVERYTHING THAT HE FOUND ANNOYING ABOUT HIS EX-WIFE, who arguably DUMPED him along with Lily at his doorstep while she flew-off with her new boyfriend to Australia! Argh!
Well, that may be how Lily's father thought of Hagan, Lily's dog, but Hagan then had a life of his own ... and that's then the rest of the film ...
Dumped then in some Budapest park far from ANY familiar surroundings, and certainly far from Lily, Hagan eventually gives up trying to find his past owner (even as she keeps looking for him). Eventually he runs into other stray dogs ... and eventually he and the other stray dogs get into trouble with local, Budapest, "Animal control" who attempt to round-up the dogs.
Hagan escapes the initial round-up by "Animal Control," but is then _sold_ by a local homeless person to some lowlife running a "dog fighting ring." Poor Hagan ESCAPES that sadist only to be caught then for real by "Animal Control." Yet, just before being Euthanized, he uses his acquired dog-fighting skills to make a quick break out of the dog pound, AND ... helps about a hundred other dogs flee pound as well.
SO ... "Dogs of Budapest UNITE, you have nothing to lose but your ... LEASHES ;-)" Soon Hagan is at the forefront of a Budapest-wide dog rebellion ;-) and pretty much ALL those who would have mistreated those poor mutts ... start getting their due.
But what of 13-year-old Lily? At the beginning of the summer ALL THAT SHE "REALLY HAD" was her dog Hagan (who was taken from her) ... and her trumpet. Well, of course, she has to play a key role now ... ;-)
Again, a it's pretty cool film ... it's just a fair number of the scenes in the film will be unsettling / disturbing to a fair number of viewers. And what is the film really about? Is it "just about dogs?" Or is it about a lot more than that? And if it is about "more than just dogs" ... How comfortable are you really, that the film makers _chose_ to make _dogs_ even OFTEN CUTE DOGS represent THE TARGETS OF OPPRESSION AMONG US.
Again, this is one COMPELLING / THOUGHT-PROVOKING if also DISTURBING film!
Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
Déjà Vu [2013]
MPAA (UR would be R) Fr. Dennis (4 Stars)
IMDb listing
CineEuropa listing
Cinemagia.ro listing*
Cosmopolitan.ro review*
LiterNet.ro (A. Gorzo) review*
MaraleEcran.net (I.M. Mares) review*
MediaFax.ro (A. Obretin) review*
Déjà Vu [2013] [IMDb] [CEu] [CM.ro]* (written and directed by Dan Chişu [IMDb] [CEu] [CM.ro]*) is a very clever film from Romania that played recently at the the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago.
It's playfully inspired by director Ridley Scott's YouTube-inspired Life in a Day [2011] project in which Scott had asked people all across the world to video record their doings on a specific day, July 24, 2010, to then send the video to Scott and his team, who assembled the often quite poignant film out of the video received.
So the current film tells a "day in the life" story of sorts as well: After several years of juggling his wife Valeria (played by Mirela Oprisor [IMDb] [CEu] [CM.ro]*) and mistress Tania (played by Ioana Flora [IMDb] [CM.ro]*) some sort of a Romanian (probably media) executive (played by director Dan Chişu [IMDb] [CEu] [CM.ro]* himself) decides _perhaps_ to "finally set things in order."
The film _made entirely_ with a camera mounted to the director's er "some sort of Romanian media executive's" head, BEGINS with the alarm-clock going off at 6 AM by the said Romanian media executive's bed at his (presumably Bucharest) home. We see his hand reach-out to turn-off the alarm and him, like most of us would do, getting-up and out of bed and heading to the bathroom to relieve himself. After doing so, he heads down to the kitchen...
... that's where we meet Tania, his mistress of 2-3 years. It's the first time that she's spent the night at the media executive's home. Before that they would presumably meet-up at hotels or at her place. SO ... today is (from Tania's perspective) finally, "different." But, it's ALSO "different" in ways that are unexpected (and not particularly pleasant) to her ... When _she_ first came down to the kitchen, before he did, she ... ran into / surprised his mother ....
Anyway, they eat breakfast, get dressed for the day ... And "the plan" is for the two of them to drive-out of city to the media exec's / his wife, Valeria's, "other place" by some water (a lake or a river) about an hour-or-two away.
So they get into the car and drive. Again, Readers remember that this entire movie is filmed using a camera mounted to the director's (some sort of media executive's) head. So we view the conversation that ensues in the car from the perspective someone who's driving the car. And let's face it, it's kind of a tense drive. The media exec and his mistress, Tania, are going to confront his wife, Valeria, at the media exec/his wife, Valeria's, "other place" an hour-or-two outside of town. And neither of the two is particularly sure how it's going to go.
Further, since they are heading to the media exec / his wife, Valeria's, "other place," this is a drive that the media exec has done MANY TIMES BEFORE ... with his wife sitting in the passenger seat (rather than, now, with his mistress...). SO ... as he and his mistress, Tania, are heading over to this place to confront his wife, Valeria, HE INEVITABLY HAS FLASHBACKS _OF MAKING THE SAME JOURNEY_ WITH HIS WIFE, VALERIA, IN OTHER, PERHAPS COLD, BUT ALSO (PERHAPS) "HAPPIER TIMES."
So what happens when they reach "the other place" and confront the Media exec's wife? I'm not going to tell you ;-) ...
What I do have to say is that this is a GREAT FILM about the messiness of adultery. A "day in the life" ... yup, one heck of a day ...
* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
IMDb listing
CineEuropa listing
Cinemagia.ro listing*
Cosmopolitan.ro review*
LiterNet.ro (A. Gorzo) review*
MaraleEcran.net (I.M. Mares) review*
MediaFax.ro (A. Obretin) review*
Déjà Vu [2013] [IMDb] [CEu] [CM.ro]* (written and directed by Dan Chişu [IMDb] [CEu] [CM.ro]*) is a very clever film from Romania that played recently at the the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago.
It's playfully inspired by director Ridley Scott's YouTube-inspired Life in a Day [2011] project in which Scott had asked people all across the world to video record their doings on a specific day, July 24, 2010, to then send the video to Scott and his team, who assembled the often quite poignant film out of the video received.
So the current film tells a "day in the life" story of sorts as well: After several years of juggling his wife Valeria (played by Mirela Oprisor [IMDb] [CEu] [CM.ro]*) and mistress Tania (played by Ioana Flora [IMDb] [CM.ro]*) some sort of a Romanian (probably media) executive (played by director Dan Chişu [IMDb] [CEu] [CM.ro]* himself) decides _perhaps_ to "finally set things in order."
The film _made entirely_ with a camera mounted to the director's er "some sort of Romanian media executive's" head, BEGINS with the alarm-clock going off at 6 AM by the said Romanian media executive's bed at his (presumably Bucharest) home. We see his hand reach-out to turn-off the alarm and him, like most of us would do, getting-up and out of bed and heading to the bathroom to relieve himself. After doing so, he heads down to the kitchen...
... that's where we meet Tania, his mistress of 2-3 years. It's the first time that she's spent the night at the media executive's home. Before that they would presumably meet-up at hotels or at her place. SO ... today is (from Tania's perspective) finally, "different." But, it's ALSO "different" in ways that are unexpected (and not particularly pleasant) to her ... When _she_ first came down to the kitchen, before he did, she ... ran into / surprised his mother ....
Anyway, they eat breakfast, get dressed for the day ... And "the plan" is for the two of them to drive-out of city to the media exec's / his wife, Valeria's, "other place" by some water (a lake or a river) about an hour-or-two away.
So they get into the car and drive. Again, Readers remember that this entire movie is filmed using a camera mounted to the director's (some sort of media executive's) head. So we view the conversation that ensues in the car from the perspective someone who's driving the car. And let's face it, it's kind of a tense drive. The media exec and his mistress, Tania, are going to confront his wife, Valeria, at the media exec/his wife, Valeria's, "other place" an hour-or-two outside of town. And neither of the two is particularly sure how it's going to go.
Further, since they are heading to the media exec / his wife, Valeria's, "other place," this is a drive that the media exec has done MANY TIMES BEFORE ... with his wife sitting in the passenger seat (rather than, now, with his mistress...). SO ... as he and his mistress, Tania, are heading over to this place to confront his wife, Valeria, HE INEVITABLY HAS FLASHBACKS _OF MAKING THE SAME JOURNEY_ WITH HIS WIFE, VALERIA, IN OTHER, PERHAPS COLD, BUT ALSO (PERHAPS) "HAPPIER TIMES."
So what happens when they reach "the other place" and confront the Media exec's wife? I'm not going to tell you ;-) ...
What I do have to say is that this is a GREAT FILM about the messiness of adultery. A "day in the life" ... yup, one heck of a day ...
* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Amour Fou [2014]
MPAA (UR would be R) Fr. Dennis (3 Stars)
IMDb listing
Film-Zeit.de listing*
aVoir-aLire.fr (E. Martin) review*
aVoir-aLire.fr (T. Baelen) review*
Critic.de (N. Klingler) review*
Kino-Zeit.de (B. Behn) review*
Sound On Sight (T. Poglajen) review
Way Too Indie (N. Grozdanovic) review
Amour Fou [2014] [IMDb] [FZ.de]* (written and directed by Jessica Hausner [IMDb] [FZ.de]*) is German period drama set in the very early 1800s largely at a country estate in Prussia somewhere outside of Berlin with the Napoleonic Wars / Controversies looming certainly in the background. Think of it as a north German Downton Abbey [2010-] [wikip] [IMDb] set at the time of Jane Austen.
The film played recently at the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago. Though as of the writing of this article it is not yet available for purchase/streaming in the United States, it is available in Europe through the Amazon Instant Video streaming service in the U.K.
From a technical, cinematographic and set design perspective this film is a wonder to behold. Almost every single scene set, both indoors and out, looks as if it is playing-out in a "Dutch Master" period painting of the time. The colors, the costuming are the highest quality.
What may disturb the American viewer especially a religious one would be the film's content. No the issue here is _certainly_ not some sort of a presentation of "wild sexual excess." LOL, far, far from it ;-). This story is set in cold, damp, (Lutheran), Northern Germany (Prussia) of the early-1800s, about as "we don't think about these things" a time and place as one could imagine ;-).
Instead, the film is largely about a very depressed 20 or 30 something year-old poet named Heinrich (interpreted magnificently by Christian Friedel [IMDb] [FZ.de]*) who, having _perhaps_ been "unlucky in love" (though honestly he might have come to the conclusion of "what's the point?" because he's arrived at the conclusion that life itself is largely pointless), has decided to look for some young woman out there TO DIE WITH HIM, that is, TO COMMIT SUICIDE WITH HIM.
Again, I tell you folks, THE FILM IS ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFULLY MADE, EVERY SHOT COULD BE A BEAUTIFUL PAINTING, but it's ABOUT A REALLY DEPRESSING ARGUABLY NIHILIST SUBJECT.
But that then is almost certainly the movie's point: There was exquisite beauty in EVERY SINGLE FRAME in this film. So why did this poet want to kill himself? And really, WHY DID GERMAN ENLIGHTENED CULTURE OF THAT TIME BEGIN TO BE SO BROODING / NIHILISTIC?
And it is actually quite funny to hear the various figures in the film, mostly petty Prussian nobility of the time, worrying about the "Revolutionary ideas" (mostly of equality, even, gasp, gender equality) coming from France even as they ignore even humor this oddly depressed poet who's looking for some young German woman to kill himself with.
Does he find one? Without much of a spoiler -- this is German film -- yes, though the circumstances and the rather strange "courtship" make the story.
Ultimately this is an exploration of then nominally Enlightened becoming Romantic European culture: Why did it lead to Depression / Death / and culminating with the two World Wars -- Murder?
Honestly, on the surface this is a very beautiful film. But it seeks to penetrate that beautiful superficiality to try to get at "what went wrong." Excellent! Just excellent!
* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
IMDb listing
Film-Zeit.de listing*
aVoir-aLire.fr (E. Martin) review*
aVoir-aLire.fr (T. Baelen) review*
Critic.de (N. Klingler) review*
Kino-Zeit.de (B. Behn) review*
Sound On Sight (T. Poglajen) review
Way Too Indie (N. Grozdanovic) review
Amour Fou [2014] [IMDb] [FZ.de]* (written and directed by Jessica Hausner [IMDb] [FZ.de]*) is German period drama set in the very early 1800s largely at a country estate in Prussia somewhere outside of Berlin with the Napoleonic Wars / Controversies looming certainly in the background. Think of it as a north German Downton Abbey [2010-] [wikip] [IMDb] set at the time of Jane Austen.
The film played recently at the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago. Though as of the writing of this article it is not yet available for purchase/streaming in the United States, it is available in Europe through the Amazon Instant Video streaming service in the U.K.
From a technical, cinematographic and set design perspective this film is a wonder to behold. Almost every single scene set, both indoors and out, looks as if it is playing-out in a "Dutch Master" period painting of the time. The colors, the costuming are the highest quality.
What may disturb the American viewer especially a religious one would be the film's content. No the issue here is _certainly_ not some sort of a presentation of "wild sexual excess." LOL, far, far from it ;-). This story is set in cold, damp, (Lutheran), Northern Germany (Prussia) of the early-1800s, about as "we don't think about these things" a time and place as one could imagine ;-).
Instead, the film is largely about a very depressed 20 or 30 something year-old poet named Heinrich (interpreted magnificently by Christian Friedel [IMDb] [FZ.de]*) who, having _perhaps_ been "unlucky in love" (though honestly he might have come to the conclusion of "what's the point?" because he's arrived at the conclusion that life itself is largely pointless), has decided to look for some young woman out there TO DIE WITH HIM, that is, TO COMMIT SUICIDE WITH HIM.
Again, I tell you folks, THE FILM IS ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFULLY MADE, EVERY SHOT COULD BE A BEAUTIFUL PAINTING, but it's ABOUT A REALLY DEPRESSING ARGUABLY NIHILIST SUBJECT.
But that then is almost certainly the movie's point: There was exquisite beauty in EVERY SINGLE FRAME in this film. So why did this poet want to kill himself? And really, WHY DID GERMAN ENLIGHTENED CULTURE OF THAT TIME BEGIN TO BE SO BROODING / NIHILISTIC?
And it is actually quite funny to hear the various figures in the film, mostly petty Prussian nobility of the time, worrying about the "Revolutionary ideas" (mostly of equality, even, gasp, gender equality) coming from France even as they ignore even humor this oddly depressed poet who's looking for some young German woman to kill himself with.
Does he find one? Without much of a spoiler -- this is German film -- yes, though the circumstances and the rather strange "courtship" make the story.
Ultimately this is an exploration of then nominally Enlightened becoming Romantic European culture: Why did it lead to Depression / Death / and culminating with the two World Wars -- Murder?
Honestly, on the surface this is a very beautiful film. But it seeks to penetrate that beautiful superficiality to try to get at "what went wrong." Excellent! Just excellent!
* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
Inferno [2014]
MPAA (UR would be R) Fr. Dennis (1 Star)
IMDb listing
Mladina.si (M. Štefančič) review*
Pogledi.si (M. Crnkovič) review*
Inferno [2014] (written and directed by Vinko Möderndorfer [en.wikip] [IMDb]) is an unabashedly neo-Communist Slovenian film that played recently at the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago. The film may-or-may not reflect contemporary Slovenian realities but by invoking, appropriating and attempting to turn-on-their-heads iconic the anti-Communist protests of Poland's wildly popular Solidarity movement (within months of its founding, something like 10 million Poles, or 1/2 of Poland's adult population were members of Solidarity) and even more gallingly, the self-immolation of venerated Czech martyr Jan Palach in protest to the 1968 Soviet led invasion his country / MY PARENTS' COUNTRY ... and argues that all these protesters / MARTYRS "had it all wrong" and the Communists were actually the "good guys."
No thank you ... that story ended when the tanks rolled into Prague to crush its attempt to build "Socialism with a Human Face." And look, as a Catholic, IN THIS REGARD CERTAINLY OF THE JOHN PAUL II STRIPE, even today Swedish (or even French) social democracy WILL ALWAYS BE FAR MORE ATTRACTIVE than either Savage Capitalism or Tito, Stalin, Brezhnev or Putin's own Restorationist Russia.
Yet to the film-maker here, as was typical of old-style Communist polemics, a "middle way" is not an option. It's EITHER a Dickensonian (in this case a Dantean) horror or Tito / Stalin. So ...
... Marko (played by Marco Bukvič) a factory worker in some Slovenian industrial town finally loses his cool and gets into an altercation with his boss named Drágan (played by Valter Drágan) breaking Drágan's arm. Well, needless to say, Marko loses his job (this would happen anywhere in the world, even in the Paradises of Soviet or Yugoslav Communism). YET ... and this MAY reflect Slovenian contemporary reality, though if it does, then it would make Slovenia operate under a system of rules that would more reflect realities of the Third World THAN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION OF WHICH IT IS A MEMBER ... since it was Marko's fault that he lost his job, he was ineligible for ANY SOCIAL ASSISTANCE.
I simply find that UNBELIEVABLE in the context of Europe and especially the European Union today. Yet, EVEN IF IT WAS TRUE ... this is NOT CAUSE to IMMEDIATELY PULL OUT THE RED BANNERS and start singing "THE INTERNATIONALE" again ... it's cause to petition Brussels and again "the Swedes" to say ... "THIS IS EUROPE, TODAY (!). WE DON'T DUMP PEOPLE, ENTIRE FAMILIES, OUT ONTO THE STREET WITH NO RECOURSE ANYMORE. Heck that MAY still happen in the such "bastions of freedom and responsibility" such as the right wing states of Texas, Kentucky and Alabama in the United States. BUT EUROPE (!), TODAY (!!). NO!"
But the director argues that his is an accurate portrayal of Slovenian life TODAY ... and the rest of the horror movie follows:
Marco's family gets evicted from their cold, humble concrete dwelling (already without heat or power) in which they live. Marco's wife (played by Madea Novák) SETS HERSELF ON FIRE in desperation / protest, with the 5 Euros worth of gasoline that she bought after prostituting herself to a patron in a nearby bar. Their two cute as a button kids are THROWN OUT OF THE CATHOLIC SCHOOL THAT THEY ATTENDED (apparently there are no public ones ...) FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO PAY and eventually taken from their widowed father because he had no place left to keep them.
Yes, this would be Hell. But is this reality in Slovenia today? PERHAPS it is, I honestly would not know, but I would doubt it. AND EVEN IF IT IS, IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE THEN A RESTORATION OF TITO / STALIN??
I don't think so. Again, just ask the Swedes ...
And I would add one last thing: I think that it is UTTERLY COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE for COMMUNISTS to STUPIDLY TO PUT DOWN THE CHURCH (as is done SEVERAL TIMES IN THIS FILM). Even PUTIN has learned that. The default position of the Church is to care. By STUPIDLY PUTTING US DOWN ... you remove AN OBVIOUS ALLY to fight the injustices that you say that you see.
* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
IMDb listing
Mladina.si (M. Štefančič) review*
Pogledi.si (M. Crnkovič) review*
Inferno [2014] (written and directed by Vinko Möderndorfer [en.wikip] [IMDb]) is an unabashedly neo-Communist Slovenian film that played recently at the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago. The film may-or-may not reflect contemporary Slovenian realities but by invoking, appropriating and attempting to turn-on-their-heads iconic the anti-Communist protests of Poland's wildly popular Solidarity movement (within months of its founding, something like 10 million Poles, or 1/2 of Poland's adult population were members of Solidarity) and even more gallingly, the self-immolation of venerated Czech martyr Jan Palach in protest to the 1968 Soviet led invasion his country / MY PARENTS' COUNTRY ... and argues that all these protesters / MARTYRS "had it all wrong" and the Communists were actually the "good guys."
No thank you ... that story ended when the tanks rolled into Prague to crush its attempt to build "Socialism with a Human Face." And look, as a Catholic, IN THIS REGARD CERTAINLY OF THE JOHN PAUL II STRIPE, even today Swedish (or even French) social democracy WILL ALWAYS BE FAR MORE ATTRACTIVE than either Savage Capitalism or Tito, Stalin, Brezhnev or Putin's own Restorationist Russia.
Yet to the film-maker here, as was typical of old-style Communist polemics, a "middle way" is not an option. It's EITHER a Dickensonian (in this case a Dantean) horror or Tito / Stalin. So ...
... Marko (played by Marco Bukvič) a factory worker in some Slovenian industrial town finally loses his cool and gets into an altercation with his boss named Drágan (played by Valter Drágan) breaking Drágan's arm. Well, needless to say, Marko loses his job (this would happen anywhere in the world, even in the Paradises of Soviet or Yugoslav Communism). YET ... and this MAY reflect Slovenian contemporary reality, though if it does, then it would make Slovenia operate under a system of rules that would more reflect realities of the Third World THAN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION OF WHICH IT IS A MEMBER ... since it was Marko's fault that he lost his job, he was ineligible for ANY SOCIAL ASSISTANCE.
I simply find that UNBELIEVABLE in the context of Europe and especially the European Union today. Yet, EVEN IF IT WAS TRUE ... this is NOT CAUSE to IMMEDIATELY PULL OUT THE RED BANNERS and start singing "THE INTERNATIONALE" again ... it's cause to petition Brussels and again "the Swedes" to say ... "THIS IS EUROPE, TODAY (!). WE DON'T DUMP PEOPLE, ENTIRE FAMILIES, OUT ONTO THE STREET WITH NO RECOURSE ANYMORE. Heck that MAY still happen in the such "bastions of freedom and responsibility" such as the right wing states of Texas, Kentucky and Alabama in the United States. BUT EUROPE (!), TODAY (!!). NO!"
But the director argues that his is an accurate portrayal of Slovenian life TODAY ... and the rest of the horror movie follows:
Marco's family gets evicted from their cold, humble concrete dwelling (already without heat or power) in which they live. Marco's wife (played by Madea Novák) SETS HERSELF ON FIRE in desperation / protest, with the 5 Euros worth of gasoline that she bought after prostituting herself to a patron in a nearby bar. Their two cute as a button kids are THROWN OUT OF THE CATHOLIC SCHOOL THAT THEY ATTENDED (apparently there are no public ones ...) FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO PAY and eventually taken from their widowed father because he had no place left to keep them.
Yes, this would be Hell. But is this reality in Slovenia today? PERHAPS it is, I honestly would not know, but I would doubt it. AND EVEN IF IT IS, IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE THEN A RESTORATION OF TITO / STALIN??
I don't think so. Again, just ask the Swedes ...
And I would add one last thing: I think that it is UTTERLY COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE for COMMUNISTS to STUPIDLY TO PUT DOWN THE CHURCH (as is done SEVERAL TIMES IN THIS FILM). Even PUTIN has learned that. The default position of the Church is to care. By STUPIDLY PUTTING US DOWN ... you remove AN OBVIOUS ALLY to fight the injustices that you say that you see.
* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
The Kid (orig. El Niño) [2014]
MPAA (UR would be R) Fr. Dennis (3 1/2 Stars)
IMDb listing
FilmAffinity.com/es listing*
SensaCine.com listing*
ACCIONCine.es (M.J. Payán) review*
CineParaLeer.com (M.A. Huerta Floriano) review*
FotoGramas.es (J. Pons) review*
The Kid (orig. El Niño) [2014] [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]* (directed and screenplay cowritten by Daniel Monzón [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]* along with Jorge Guerricaechevarría [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) is a critically acclaimed / multiple Goya (Spanish) / Gaudi (Catalan) Award-winning crime drama from Spain that played recently at the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago. Though as of the writing of this article, not yet available for purchase/streaming in the United States, it is available in Europe through the Amazon Instant Video streaming service in the U.K.
The film is set at the southern tip of Spain / Iberian Peninsula at the Strait of Gibraltar (separating Europe from Africa by a span of only 10 miles) where three sovereign jurisdictions come into close contact -- Spain and its port of Algeciras, the U.K. at Gibraltar and then across the strait, Morocco, with a Spanish Gibraltar-like possession of Ceuta on the Moroccan (African) side of the strait as well.
That SO MANY political entities with VERY DIFFERENT OUTLOOKS regarding history, governance, law and even religion -- Spain historically über-Catholic and since the 1800s following a Napoleonic Code approach toward the Law, the UK since the Reformation famously historically Defender of the Protestant faith and following a much older (but IMHO more organic / flexible) Common Law approach to the Law and the Kingdom of Morocco historically Muslim and leaning necessarily toward a Islam influenced understanding of Law -- exist IN SUCH CLOSE PROXIMITY and AND AT THE POINT OF CLOSEST CONTACT BETWEEN TWO ENTIRE CONTINENTS / (ARGUABLY) CIVILIZATIONS makes the region absolutely IDEAL GROUND FOR TALES OF INTRIGUE AND SMUGGLING.
Hence the historical / political backdrop to the film ... and, IMHO, the film generally does not disappoint.
The film really tells two perhaps even three stories that become increasingly intertwined as the film progresses:
The first involves a team of Spanish federal police officers -- Jesús (played by Luis Tosar [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*), Eva (played by Bárbara Lennie [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) and Sergio (played by Eduard Fernández [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*), based in the Spanish Port City of Algeciras tasked, already for over two years, to break-up a cocaine smuggling operation from Latin America that they find is actually being masterminded by a ring of Russian - Kosovar Albanian mafiosi. They are frustrated because becomes is clear to them that the smugglers here are playing-off police / port officials at the two jurisdictions Gibraltar (U.K.) - Algeciras (Spain) against each other, fainting toward one port / jurisdiction and then delivering through the other. And it appears that cooperation in anti-smuggling operations between the two jurisdictions is poor to nil, compromised certainly by lingering mutual suspicion (even though both the U.K. and Spain are in the E.U.), and then, when one's talking about drug smuggling ... certainly money.
The second story involves two twenty something Spanish "good ole boy" buddies -- Niño (played by Jesús Castro [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) and Compi (played by Jesús Carroza [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) who get it into their heads that it'd be "really cool" to buy a "beach side bar" out there on the Southwestern tip of Spain. Niño's (lit. "the kid") even scouted out a place on a still presently secluded beach some miles outside of town. All they need is 250K Euro for a down-payment and it's theirs.
But how to get 250K? Well Niño's something of a daredevil, having driven his jet-ski recently CLEAR ACROSS THE STRAIT to Morocco thinking it "way cool" to pick-up a small rock (note that Gibraltar is nicknamed "The Rock") "a small piece of Africa" and bring it back with him to show-off to friends back in Spain. Niño also "has a connection" with Halil (played magnificently by Saed Chatiby [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) a late-teen/early 20-something Moroccan immigrant working in a local "Felafel Stand" AND HE can "hook them up" with his uncle Rachid (played by Moussa Maaskri [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) who's the local "hashish smuggling" king-pin. Honestly, "what could go wrong with this plan? :-) Volunteer to make a few runs (Niño initially thinking JUST USING HIS JET SKI) and they'd be "in like Flynn" "basking in the glory" of owning A GREAT BEACH SIDE BAR "just outside of town" with "all the babes there for their picking." (That even Compi actually is already living with a long-time girlfriend (played by Inma Perez [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) doesn't seem to detract from Niño's dream ...).
Well Halil does introduce Niño and Compi to his uncle Rachid. Halil, who knows better, is scared. Rachid sees two morons, eyes-rolling even explaining to Niño that jet skis would be ridiculously small potatoes for his operation. He uses speedboats which race across the strait at times when, coordinated with spotters, the smugglers know that Spanish police/customs helicopters are on the ground, refueling.
Yet Rachid is impressed with Niño's 20-something bravado. So he decides to give Niño, Campi "a try" at running a shipment with one of his (Rachid's) speedboat one night. Niño's kinda crestfallen / pissed off when he finds that "the shipment" that he was tasked to deliver turned out to be packages of _sand_ rather than hashish but Halil calms him down reminding him that his uncle wanted to make sure that he and Compi were up to the task (of running a shipment across the Strait) before he'd entrust them with a cargo worth the trouble.
Niño and Compi "pass" (more or less) this test and so become "runners" for in this Moroccan hash-smuggling operation (still actually considered "small time" / "not worth the trouble to bust" (unless they became really craven or stupid...) by Spanish police officials like the group led by Jesús described above.
This then involves Niño and Compi (as well as viewers of the film) into the third story playing-out in the film: that of the lives and challenges of Moroccans living on both sides of the Strait.
In the course of the film, Niño falls in love with Halil's sister Anina (played magnificently by Mariam Bachir [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) who wears a Muslim head-scarf in Morocco, is comfortable in shedding it once she's is in the Spanish possession Ceuta still on the African side of the Strait and proves ultimately capable, if reluctantly, of falling in love with and (parents take note) sleeping with Niño on a secluded beach on the Spanish side of the Strait. She's the same person, though capable of adapting to three different sets of cultural mores. And truth be told, it's clear that she DOESN'T particularly like the overly libertine mores of Spain today, where young women ARE EXPECTED TO GO TOPLESS or even NUDE on the beach and similarly EXPECTED TO HOP INTO BED when their boyfriends beckon.... Interesting, huh? Indeed, when one thinks about it, the Islamic headscarf seems a lot less intrusive to women's dignity then the _expectations_ of toplessness and even full nudity on Europe's beaches today ...
Anyway it is ANINA who reminds Niño that a life of crime doesn't exactly have a future. Yet Niño is Niño and ... "Niño has a dream..." So much has ensue ...
The story that ensues becomes a very interesting / pointed story ... and on several levels. Yes, clearly the continued "special status" of Gibraltar is shown as an irritant Spanish sensibilities as well as an impediment to law enforcement operations (how true that actually is, an American like me could only guess). However, there's ALSO a rather interesting (and sympathetic) portrayal of the Moroccan community in Southern Spain and the possibility that it could teach contemporary Spaniards a thing or two about morality (and _not just_ sexual morality but ALSO with regard to entering into criminal activity).
In any case, it makes for a very interesting film, and a great film to show early in the course of this annual European Union Film Festival that's organized every year at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago. Good job folks! Good job!
* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
IMDb listing
FilmAffinity.com/es listing*
SensaCine.com listing*
ACCIONCine.es (M.J. Payán) review*
CineParaLeer.com (M.A. Huerta Floriano) review*
FotoGramas.es (J. Pons) review*
The Kid (orig. El Niño) [2014] [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]* (directed and screenplay cowritten by Daniel Monzón [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]* along with Jorge Guerricaechevarría [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) is a critically acclaimed / multiple Goya (Spanish) / Gaudi (Catalan) Award-winning crime drama from Spain that played recently at the 2015 - 18th Chicago European Union Film Festival held at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago. Though as of the writing of this article, not yet available for purchase/streaming in the United States, it is available in Europe through the Amazon Instant Video streaming service in the U.K.
The film is set at the southern tip of Spain / Iberian Peninsula at the Strait of Gibraltar (separating Europe from Africa by a span of only 10 miles) where three sovereign jurisdictions come into close contact -- Spain and its port of Algeciras, the U.K. at Gibraltar and then across the strait, Morocco, with a Spanish Gibraltar-like possession of Ceuta on the Moroccan (African) side of the strait as well.
That SO MANY political entities with VERY DIFFERENT OUTLOOKS regarding history, governance, law and even religion -- Spain historically über-Catholic and since the 1800s following a Napoleonic Code approach toward the Law, the UK since the Reformation famously historically Defender of the Protestant faith and following a much older (but IMHO more organic / flexible) Common Law approach to the Law and the Kingdom of Morocco historically Muslim and leaning necessarily toward a Islam influenced understanding of Law -- exist IN SUCH CLOSE PROXIMITY and AND AT THE POINT OF CLOSEST CONTACT BETWEEN TWO ENTIRE CONTINENTS / (ARGUABLY) CIVILIZATIONS makes the region absolutely IDEAL GROUND FOR TALES OF INTRIGUE AND SMUGGLING.
Hence the historical / political backdrop to the film ... and, IMHO, the film generally does not disappoint.
The film really tells two perhaps even three stories that become increasingly intertwined as the film progresses:
The first involves a team of Spanish federal police officers -- Jesús (played by Luis Tosar [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*), Eva (played by Bárbara Lennie [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) and Sergio (played by Eduard Fernández [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*), based in the Spanish Port City of Algeciras tasked, already for over two years, to break-up a cocaine smuggling operation from Latin America that they find is actually being masterminded by a ring of Russian - Kosovar Albanian mafiosi. They are frustrated because becomes is clear to them that the smugglers here are playing-off police / port officials at the two jurisdictions Gibraltar (U.K.) - Algeciras (Spain) against each other, fainting toward one port / jurisdiction and then delivering through the other. And it appears that cooperation in anti-smuggling operations between the two jurisdictions is poor to nil, compromised certainly by lingering mutual suspicion (even though both the U.K. and Spain are in the E.U.), and then, when one's talking about drug smuggling ... certainly money.
The second story involves two twenty something Spanish "good ole boy" buddies -- Niño (played by Jesús Castro [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) and Compi (played by Jesús Carroza [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) who get it into their heads that it'd be "really cool" to buy a "beach side bar" out there on the Southwestern tip of Spain. Niño's (lit. "the kid") even scouted out a place on a still presently secluded beach some miles outside of town. All they need is 250K Euro for a down-payment and it's theirs.
But how to get 250K? Well Niño's something of a daredevil, having driven his jet-ski recently CLEAR ACROSS THE STRAIT to Morocco thinking it "way cool" to pick-up a small rock (note that Gibraltar is nicknamed "The Rock") "a small piece of Africa" and bring it back with him to show-off to friends back in Spain. Niño also "has a connection" with Halil (played magnificently by Saed Chatiby [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) a late-teen/early 20-something Moroccan immigrant working in a local "Felafel Stand" AND HE can "hook them up" with his uncle Rachid (played by Moussa Maaskri [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) who's the local "hashish smuggling" king-pin. Honestly, "what could go wrong with this plan? :-) Volunteer to make a few runs (Niño initially thinking JUST USING HIS JET SKI) and they'd be "in like Flynn" "basking in the glory" of owning A GREAT BEACH SIDE BAR "just outside of town" with "all the babes there for their picking." (That even Compi actually is already living with a long-time girlfriend (played by Inma Perez [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) doesn't seem to detract from Niño's dream ...).
Well Halil does introduce Niño and Compi to his uncle Rachid. Halil, who knows better, is scared. Rachid sees two morons, eyes-rolling even explaining to Niño that jet skis would be ridiculously small potatoes for his operation. He uses speedboats which race across the strait at times when, coordinated with spotters, the smugglers know that Spanish police/customs helicopters are on the ground, refueling.
Yet Rachid is impressed with Niño's 20-something bravado. So he decides to give Niño, Campi "a try" at running a shipment with one of his (Rachid's) speedboat one night. Niño's kinda crestfallen / pissed off when he finds that "the shipment" that he was tasked to deliver turned out to be packages of _sand_ rather than hashish but Halil calms him down reminding him that his uncle wanted to make sure that he and Compi were up to the task (of running a shipment across the Strait) before he'd entrust them with a cargo worth the trouble.
Niño and Compi "pass" (more or less) this test and so become "runners" for in this Moroccan hash-smuggling operation (still actually considered "small time" / "not worth the trouble to bust" (unless they became really craven or stupid...) by Spanish police officials like the group led by Jesús described above.
This then involves Niño and Compi (as well as viewers of the film) into the third story playing-out in the film: that of the lives and challenges of Moroccans living on both sides of the Strait.
In the course of the film, Niño falls in love with Halil's sister Anina (played magnificently by Mariam Bachir [IMDb] [FAes]* [SC]*) who wears a Muslim head-scarf in Morocco, is comfortable in shedding it once she's is in the Spanish possession Ceuta still on the African side of the Strait and proves ultimately capable, if reluctantly, of falling in love with and (parents take note) sleeping with Niño on a secluded beach on the Spanish side of the Strait. She's the same person, though capable of adapting to three different sets of cultural mores. And truth be told, it's clear that she DOESN'T particularly like the overly libertine mores of Spain today, where young women ARE EXPECTED TO GO TOPLESS or even NUDE on the beach and similarly EXPECTED TO HOP INTO BED when their boyfriends beckon.... Interesting, huh? Indeed, when one thinks about it, the Islamic headscarf seems a lot less intrusive to women's dignity then the _expectations_ of toplessness and even full nudity on Europe's beaches today ...
Anyway it is ANINA who reminds Niño that a life of crime doesn't exactly have a future. Yet Niño is Niño and ... "Niño has a dream..." So much has ensue ...
The story that ensues becomes a very interesting / pointed story ... and on several levels. Yes, clearly the continued "special status" of Gibraltar is shown as an irritant Spanish sensibilities as well as an impediment to law enforcement operations (how true that actually is, an American like me could only guess). However, there's ALSO a rather interesting (and sympathetic) portrayal of the Moroccan community in Southern Spain and the possibility that it could teach contemporary Spaniards a thing or two about morality (and _not just_ sexual morality but ALSO with regard to entering into criminal activity).
In any case, it makes for a very interesting film, and a great film to show early in the course of this annual European Union Film Festival that's organized every year at the Gene Siskel Film Center here in Chicago. Good job folks! Good job!
* Reasonably good (sense) translations of non-English webpages can be found by viewing them through Google's Chrome browser.
<< NOTE - Do you like what you've been reading here? If you do then consider giving a small donation to this Blog (sugg. $6 _non-recurring_) _every so often_ to continue/further its operation. To donate just CLICK HERE. Thank you! :-) >>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)